Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGocer, Ozgur
dc.contributor.authorCandido, Christhina
dc.contributor.authorThomas, Leena
dc.contributor.authorGocer, Kenan
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-15T13:06:10Z
dc.date.available2021-03-15T13:06:10Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.issn2075-5309
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3390/buildings9090199
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12879/112
dc.descriptiongocer, ozgur/0000-0002-3978-440X; Thomas, Leena/0000-0003-0707-9260; Candido, Christhina/0000-0002-1966-657Xen_US
dc.descriptionWOS:000487653800010en_US
dc.description.abstractThis paper reports the results from a dataset comprising 9794 post-occupancy evaluation (POE) surveys from 77 Australian open-plan offices. This paper specifically focuses on a sub-set of 20 offices (n = 2133), identified from ranking 10 offices each, with the least (n = 1063) and highest (n = 1070) satisfaction scores, respectively. The satisfaction scores were evaluated on the basis of seven factors (i.e., building/office aesthetics and quality, thermal comfort and indoor air quality, noise distraction and privacy, personal control, connection to outdoor environment, maintenance and visual comfort, and individual space). Using the POE survey data from 20 offices, regression analyses and two-way ANOVA tests were carried out to understand the differences in occupants' satisfaction and perceived productivity arising from open-plan offices. According to the statistically significant regression analyses results, it was identified that building/office aesthetics and quality (beta = 0.55, p < 0.001) and noise distraction and privacy (beta = 0.33, p < 0.001) were the two strongest predictors contributing perceived productivity in low-performance offices. Two-way ANOVA test results for the 10 high-performance offices indicate that the perceived productivity was strongly associated with the office's physical configuration, the employees' working experience, and the working hours at that office.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipUniversity of Sydney's DVC Research Bridging Support Grant [G199771, G192167]en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis research was funded by the University of Sydney's DVC Research Bridging Support Grant (G199771) and Cachet Group (G192167).en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMdpien_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectindoor environmental qualityen_US
dc.subjectopen-plan officesen_US
dc.subjectuser satisfactionen_US
dc.subjectperceived productivityen_US
dc.subjectoffice designen_US
dc.subjectpost-occupancy evaluationen_US
dc.titleDifferences in Occupants' Satisfaction and Perceived Productivity in High- and Low-Performance Officesen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentBeykoz Üniversitesi Muhendislik ve Mimarlik Fakultesien_US
dc.contributor.institutionauthorGocer, Kenan
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/buildings9090199
dc.identifier.volume9en_US
dc.identifier.issue9en_US
dc.relation.journalBuildingsen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record