Can Sustainability Reporting Make a Difference?: A Qualitative Analysis on Sustainability Reports of BIST Listed Agri-Food Companies in Turkey

Loading...
Publication Logo

Date

2024

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Ege Univ, Fac Economics & Admin Sciences

Abstract

Agri -business is a huge industry, including all operations from farm -level production to storage, manufacture, and distribution of agricultural commodities. This fact, together with worsening social and environmental conditions and pandemic crises, has added to a change in the perception of agriculture in economic construction. The following decades will most probably witness a resurgence of agriculture -based development recipes fed by social, environmental, and governance dimensions of sustainability. This article searches for the sustainability reports of agri-business firms listed in BIST in Turkey. A sampling includes 11 out of 64 listed agri-business firms having recent sustainability reports, which are examined by qualitative data analysis techniques with MAXQDA software. The first argument our findings support is that the agri-food sector is lagging in sustainability reporting compared to other sectors. Second, companies are more ready to comply with issues that are legally regulated. Third, environmental problems are more addressed than social and economic sustainability standards. This study also shows the relative unimportance of topics such as child labor, pesticide use, supply chain traceability, women entrepreneurship, and geographical indication, which can have positive impacts on the Turkish agricultural space if big companies integrate these topics more into their sustainability reporting processes. This article contributes to the literature on sustainability in general and reporting in the agri-food sector in particular.

Description

Gürsoy, Ozgür Burçak/0000-0002-5484-6533; Akbaş, İlkay/0000-0001-6681-9949

Keywords

Sustainability Reports, Agri-Business, Turkey, BIST, Qualitative Analysis, Maxqda

WoS Q

Q4

Scopus Q

N/A

Source

Ege Academic Review

Volume

24

Issue

2

Start Page

233

End Page

248